|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TWO
Vesica
Pisces
In
the Vesica Pisces, each centre stands on the other's circumference. Thereby,
One becomes Two. Its axis has the length of root three, as compared to
the circle radii.
|
Double
Vesica
Repeating
this process inside the Vesica and at right-angles gives us an inner circle
that is one-third the radius of the outer one, which may help us to get
a handle on the
|
Torus
If we gradually rotate
the Vesica design, in six steps, this gives us the Torus of '97;
where the outer circle has thrice the radius of that within.
|
![]() |
Binary
fission
A straight line emerges
from the division of circles, and there are finally thirty-two tiny circles
along that line: one could call this design, two to the fifth. A
repeated sub-division takes place, starting from the primal unity. It expresses
the geometric progression 20 21 22 23
24 25, doubling each time, or 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32,
where the standing corn signifies even-numbered powers! One can draw a
line through its centre, that makes a tangent to ten different circles
at once.
The 'pentium' computer
chip is so-called because it has a 32-based structure, i.e. 25 .
Before that computer chips had a 16-fold design, and in a year or two the
64-based chip is due to arrive. Computers use binary logic.
|
Ratio
This
expresses the 2 : 3 ratio, but altogether it has ratios of 1 : 2 : 3 :
9, where 1 is the interval between the circles and 9 is the radius of the
surrounding circle. Thus, seen and unseen touch each other.
|
| These arcs are then rotated at five-degree
intervals, to give 72 arcs going each way, with 18 replications of our
original diagram. Arcs both outside and inside the two concentric circles
all have to fade away and the basic template thereby emerges. As
there are 18 circle-centres per quadrant, so likewise are there 18 crossover-lines
per strip, going from inner to outer surface, and there are 72 of these
‘strips’, giving a total number of ‘squares’ thereby generated equal to
the fourth power of 6 – provided one counts all the triangular edge-shapes
along boundaries as halves (3): that’s what Allen Brown did. Clearly, the
ratio between outer and inner circles has to be exact, for this quite large
number to be valid.
A sixfold design was inscribed onto this template by the Circlemakers. Here is a different one, to give an idea of how it works. The wheat field allowed no access to the centre or even near it for construction. Only Steve Alexander flew over and photographed it, during the few brief hours of its existence. Allan Brown then discerned and drew its underlying structure.
Note that the outermost part of this pattern is hardly ‘formatted’ with squares. The best and only published image is that published in Crop circles, Signs, Wonders and Mysteries by Steve and Karen Alexander 2006, p.181. However, from this writer’s special request, Steve most kindly dug up another image from his fly-over, taken at a better angle than that published, and here it is! This is a close enough resolution to see that the ‘slices’ do not all have the same thickness. However it does look like an exact 2:1 ratio between inner and outer circles, which is problematic for the analysis given here.
A braided pattern was woven on a square template. The same pattern, half-size, then spiralled in towards the centre, in eight braids. The construction design given by Ohayv may not be very credible, and we here prefer the indications given by Allan Brown. A Vesica Pisces design has circles of half
the size packed inside, as shown. Let us suppose that the pattern unfolds
with all of these small circles thus touching. An interlinked sequence
of Vesica Pisces at right angles to each other is thereby constructed.
In this diagram, the yellow-coloured small circles represent the flattened
wheat, while the others merely define the pattern. The pattern of wheat
left standing is shaded in red.
The outer boundary is constructed by enlarging
the upper set of large circles on our diagram by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|